← Cases

Moore v. United States ex rel. Newcomb Motor Co.

216 U.S. 608 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1910-03-07 Docket No. 115 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 608
MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY.

Syllabus

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF, COLUMBIA.
No. 115.
Argued March 1, 2, 1910.
Decided March 7, 1910.
A writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia dismissed for want df jurisdiction without opinion on the authority of Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1 , and other cases cited.
Writ of error to review 33 App. D. C. 597 , dismissed.
Mr. Frederick P. Fish and Mr. Melville Church, with whom Mr.'Albert G. -Davis was on the briéf,'for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Robert N. Kenyon, with whom Mr. Walter F. Rogers and Mr. Charles H.- Duell were on the brief, for defendant in error.

The writ of error is dismissed for want of •jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1 ; Rousseau v. Browne, 21 App. D. C. 73 , 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U. S. 284 ; Atkins v. Moore, 212 U. S. 285 ; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U. S. 561 ; Same v. Same, 27 App. D. C. 530 , 532; Taylor v. Taft, 203 U. S. 461 ; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280 ; Baltimore & Potomac R. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210 , 226. The application for certiorari is also denied.

Cases cited