Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Shine v. Fox Bros. Manufacturing Co. 216 U.S. 609

← Cases

Shine v. Fox Bros. Manufacturing Co.

216 U.S. 609 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1910-03-07 Docket No. 383 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 609
SHINE v. FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Syllabus

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATICS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
No. 383.
Motion to dismiss submitted February 21, 1910.
Decided March 7, 1910.
A direct appeal from the Circuit Court dismissed without opinion for want of jurisdiction.
Appeal from 150 Fed. Rep. 357 , dismissed.
The motion to dismiss was made on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, for the reason that the jurisdiction of the court below rested on the diversity of citizenship of the parties, and no constitutional or other question was properly presented in the court below so as to confer jurisdiction of the appeal upon this court.
Mr. Shepard Barclay, Mr. Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Mr. Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for the appellants.
Mr. Herbert Ii. Marlatt, Mr. George S. Johnson, Mr. George M. Block and Mr. Frank H. Sullivan for. the appellee.

In the circumstances disclosed by this record we are of opinion .that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the Circuit Court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.