Duval v. Louisiana

239 U.S. 626 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1915-10-25 Docket No. 223 English

Delivered by *626 Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 626

No. 223.

James Duval et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Louisiana.

Syllabus

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.

Argued October 18,1915.

Decided October 25, 1915.

Mr. Edward N. Pugh and Mr.

p. 627

Philip S. Pugh for the plaintiffs in error.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112 , 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102 ; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31 ; (2) Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert, 116 U. S. 642 ; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68 ; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164 .

Mr. R. G. Pleasant and Mr. Daniel Wendling for the defendant in error.

Cases cited

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas 212 U. S. 112 SCOTUS 1909-01-18 p. 627
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102 SCOTUS 1912-12-02 p. 627
Overton v. Oklahoma 235 U. S. 31 SCOTUS 1914-11-09 p. 627
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert 116 U. S. 642 SCOTUS 1886-02-01 p. 627
Hayes v. Missouri 120 U. S. 68 SCOTUS 1887-01-17 p. 627
Howard v. Kentucky 200 U. S. 164 SCOTUS 1906-01-02 p. 627