Majority
p. 632No. 689. George M. Diener et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. I. M. Lane et al. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 29, 1915. Decided December 6, 1915.
Syllabus
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.Mr. J. M. Collins and Mr. J. H. Hazelrigg for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. E. L. Worthington for the defendants in erron
Dismissed for want of jurisdic-
tion upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596 , 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123 , 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380 ; (2) Lancaster v. Thacker, 239 17. S., ante, p. 625; Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 239 U. S., ante, p. 625; (3) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112 , 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102 ; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31 .
Cases cited
- Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co. 228 U. S. 596 p. 632
- Manhattan Life Insurance v. Cohen 234 U. S. 123 p. 632
- Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce 235 U. S. 380 p. 632
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas 212 U. S. 112 p. 632
- Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102 p. 632
- Overton v. Oklahoma 235 U. S. 31 p. 632