← Cases

Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co.

241 U.S. 646 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1916-03-20 Docket No. 294 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 646
No. 294.
F. P. Seekatz, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Medina Valley Irrigation Company et al.

Syllabus

In error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas..
Argued for the plaintiff in error and submitted for the defendant in error March 15 and 16, 1916.
Decided March 20, 1916.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596 , 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123 , 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380 ; (2) Mississippi & Red River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403 ; Madisonville Traction Co. v. St. Bernard Mining Co., 196

p. 647
U. S. 239 ; Mason City &c. Railroad v. Boynton, 204 U. S. 570 ; (3) Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226 , 244-245; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548 , 593; Backus v. Fort Street Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557 , 569; (4) Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 ; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598 ; O’Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244 , 253-254.

Mr. C. L. Bass, Mr. T. T. VanderHoeven and Mr. Joseph W. Bailey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Floyd McGown for the defendant in error.

Cases cited