Hyperlawhypertext legal database United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis 241 U.S. 647

← Cases

United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

241 U.S. 647 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1916-04-10 Docket Nos. 365 and 367; No. 366; No. 368; No. 369; No. 370; No. 371; No. 372 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 647
Nos. 365 and 367.
United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis.

Syllabus

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Argued April 4 and 5, 1916.
Decided April 10, 1916.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361 ; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93 ; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536 , 541; Mellon Co. v. Mc

p. 648
St. Louis & Suburban Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis. Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis, and St. Louis Transit Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis.

Cafferty, 239 U. S. 134 ; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596 , 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469 , 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14 ; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61 , 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680 ; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123 , 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350 , 366.

No. 366.

No. 368.

No. 369.

No. 370.

No. 371.

No. 372.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Danes for the defendant in error.

Cases cited