Majority
p. 649No. 863. No. 864. No. 865. Allison Manchester, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Hartford; Allison Manchester et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Hartford; and Emma Manchester et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Board of Water Commissioners of the
p. 650City of Hartford. Argued April 12, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916.
Syllabus
In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut.Mr. Edward H. Rogers, Mr. Birdsey E. Case and Mr. Edward D. Robbins for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edward M. Day and Mr. Alvan Waldo Hyde for the defendants in error.
Judgment affirmed with costs upoñ the authority of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 , 160; Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361 , 367-369; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598 ; Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., 233 U. S. 211 , 218-219; O’Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244 , 253; Mount Vernon Cotton Co. v. Alabama Power Co., 240 U. S. 30 , 32.
Cases cited
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley 164 U. S. 112 p. 650
- Clark v. Nash 198 U. S. 361 p. 650
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co. 208 U. S. 598 p. 650
- Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 233 U. S. 211 p. 650
- O'Neill v. Leamer 239 U. S. 244 p. 650
- Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co. 240 U. S. 30 p. 650