Majority
p. 611No. 507. John G. Christopher et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Jane Mungen and Henry Mungen, her Husband. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 9, 1916. Decided October 23, 1916.
Syllabus
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida.Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361 ; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468 , 470; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134 ; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102 , 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596 , 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469 . Mr. George C. Bedell for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Nathan P. Bryan and Mr. J. T. G. Crawford for the defendants in error.
Cases cited
- Eustis v. Bolles 150 U. S. 361 p. 611
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon 223 U. S. 468 p. 611
- Mellon Co. v. McCafferty 239 U. S. 134 p. 611
- Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102 p. 611
- Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co. 228 U. S. 596 p. 611
- Parker v. McLain 237 U. S. 469 p. 611