Susman v. Board of Education of the School District

245 U.S. 636 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1918-01-14 Docket No. 108 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 636

No. 108.

Harry Susman, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the School District of Pittsburgh.

Syllabus

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 2, 1918.

Decided January 14, 1918.

Mr. Andrew G, Smith, Mr. W. H. Dodds and Mr. Janies M. Beck for appellant.

Mr. J. Roger McCreary and Mr. Samuel S. Mehard for appellee.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210 , 217; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 ; Soliah v. Heskin, 222 U. S. 522 ; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102 , 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596 , 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652 , 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14 .

Cases cited

Witherspoon v. Duncan 4 Wall. 210 SCOTUS p. 636
Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley 164 U. S. 112 SCOTUS 1896-11-16 p. 636
Soliah v. Heskin 222 U. S. 522 SCOTUS 1912-01-09 p. 636
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102 SCOTUS 1912-12-02 p. 636
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co. 228 U. S. 596 SCOTUS 1913-05-12 p. 636
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis 233 U. S. 652 SCOTUS 1914-05-25 p. 636
Stewart v. City of Kansas 239 U. S. 14 SCOTUS 1915-11-01 p. 636