McLaughlin v. United States — 251 U.S. 541

Majority

p. 541

No. 591.

Matty McLaughlin v. United States.

Syllabus

Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

Submitted January 5, 1920.

Decided January 12, 1920.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402 , 410-411; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324 , 328-337; O’Neal v. United States, 190 U. S. 36 , 37-38. (2) Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co., 150 U. S. 171 ; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324 ; Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89 . (3) In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393 , 399-401. (4) Itow v. United States, 233 U. S. 581 ; Sugarman v. United States,

p. 542

249 U. S. 182 , 184. Mr. Daniel L. Cruice and Mr. Rob V. Phillips for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. A. F. Myers for the United States. Mr. Thos. H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles, by leave of court, filed a brief as amid curios.

Cases cited

Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States 247 U. S. 402 SCOTUS 1918-06-10 p. 541
Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co. 194 U. S. 324 SCOTUS 1904-05-16 p. 541
O'Neal v. United States 190 U. S. 36 SCOTUS 1903-06-01 p. 541
150 U. S. 171 150 U. S. 171 p. 541
Maynard v. Hecht 151 U. S. 324 SCOTUS 1894-01-22 p. 541
Courtney v. Pradt 196 U. S. 89 SCOTUS 1905-01-03 p. 541
In re Lennon 150 U. S. 393 SCOTUS 1893-11-27 p. 541
Itow v. United States 233 U. S. 581 SCOTUS 1914-05-11 p. 541
Sugarman v. United States 249 U. S. 182 SCOTUS 1919-03-03 p. 542