← Cases

Purcell v. City of Lexington ex rel. Coyne

253 U.S. 476 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1920-06-01 Docket No. 708 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 476
No. 708.
J. D. Purcell et al. v. City of Lexington on Relation op Thomas E. Coyne, Back Tax Assessor.

Syllabus

Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Motion to dismiss submitted May 17, 1920.
Decided June 1, 1920.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon thé authority of: (1) New Orleans Waterworks v. Louisiana Sugar Co., 125 U. S. 18 , 38, 39; Central Land Co. v, Laidley, 159 U. S. 103 , 111; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207 , 216; McCullough v. Virginia, 172 U. S. 102 , 116; Hubert v. New Orleans, 215 U. S. 170 , 175; Missouri & Kansas Interurban By. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 187 ,190. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89 , 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225 , 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71 , ,79; Brolan v. United States, 236

p. 477
U. S. 216 , 218; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182 , 184.

Mr. George C. Webb and Mr. George R. Hunt for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Jesse I. Miller and Mr. Harry B. Miller for defendant in error.

Cases cited