Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton — 254 U.S. 610

Majority

p. 610

No. 217.

Auglaize Box Board Company v. Bessie Hinton, etc., et al.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389 , 393; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.

p. 611

S. 300 ,303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255 , 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268 , 271. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89 , 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71 , 79; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Maucher, 248 U. S. 359 , 362; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114 , 118. Mr. Earl H. Turner for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Goeke, Mr. T. T. Ansberry and Mr. George T. Farrell for defendants in error.

Cases cited

California Powder Works v. Davis 151 U. S. 389 SCOTUS 1894-01-22 p. 610
Bilby v. Stewart 246 U. S. 255 SCOTUS 1918-03-04 p. 611
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird 248 U. S. 268 SCOTUS 1919-01-07 p. 611
Farrell v. O'Brien 199 U. S. 89 SCOTUS 1905-05-29 p. 611
Goodrich v. Ferris 214 U. S. 71 SCOTUS 1909-05-17 p. 611
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Maucher 248 U. S. 359 SCOTUS 1919-01-07 p. 611
Berkman v. United States 250 U. S. 114 SCOTUS 1919-05-19 p. 611