Majority
p. 620No. 160. Maggie Harjo v. W. A. Kunkle et al.
Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89 , 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225 , 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71 , 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580 , 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140 , 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182 , 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114 , 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193 . Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.
Cases cited
- Farrell v. O'Brien 199 U. S. 89 p. 620
- Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley 205 U. S. 225 p. 620
- Goodrich v. Ferris 214 U. S. 71 p. 620
- Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U. S. 580 p. 620
- United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co. 238 U. S. 140 p. 620
- Sugarman v. United States 249 U. S. 182 p. 620
- Berkman v. United States 250 U. S. 114 p. 620
- Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham 253 U. S. 193 p. 620