Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co. 258 U.S. 604

← Cases

Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.

258 U.S. 604 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1922-03-13 Docket No. 152; No. 266 English

Delivered by Per Curiam,.

Contents

Majority

p. 604
No. 152.
No. 266.
Borough of Edgewood v . Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Company et al; and Borough of Edgewood v. Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
p. 605
et al.

Syllabus

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania.
Mr. M. W. Acheson, Jr., with whom Mr. Charles A. Jones, Mr. John D. Meyer, Mr. Roy' G. Bostwick and Mr. James R. Sterrett, were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin W. Smith, with whom Mr. John F. Weiss and Mr. Frank M. Hunter were on the briefs, for defendants in error. Mr. H. B. Gill, by leave of court, filed a brief as amicus curiae.
Argued March 6, 1922.
Decided March 13, 1922.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394 , 397; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652 ; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon; point (3), 255 U. S. 562 ; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609 ; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617 ; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618 .

Cases cited