Department of Trade & Commerce of Nebraska v. Hertz

260 U.S. 696 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1922-10-16 Docket No. 557 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 696

No. 557.

Department of Trade & Commerce of the State of Nebraska et al. v. A. J. Hertz et al., Receivers, etc., et al.

Syllabus

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 3, 1922.

Decided October 16, 1922.

Mr. John F. Stout, Mr. Halleck F. Rose and Mr. Arthur R. Wells for appellants. Mr. Bruce W. Sanborn for appellees.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.'S. 225 ; Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137 , 144; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U. S. 166 , 173; (2) Aspen Mining .& Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31 , 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325 , 332-334; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S.' 519 , 521-522; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412 , 415-416.

Cases cited

Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co. 228 U. S. 137 SCOTUS 1913-04-07 p. 696
De Rees v. Costaguta 254 U. S. 166 SCOTUS 1920-12-06 p. 696
Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings 150 U. S. 31 SCOTUS 1893-10-23 p. 696
Brown v. Alton Water Co. 222 U. S. 325 SCOTUS 1912-01-09 p. 696
Shapiro v. United States 235 U. S. 412 SCOTUS 1914-12-14 p. 696