Donley v. Van Horn — 260 U.S. 697

Majority

p. 697

No. 55. No. 56.

Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West.

Error to the District Court of Appieal, Second Appellate District, of the State of California.

Submitted October 11, 1922.

Decided October 16, 1922.

Mr. A. Haines for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles R. Pierce and Air. John M. Sutton for defendantsdn error;

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173 , 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99 , 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413 , 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18 , 19.

Schlosser v. Hemphill 198 U. S. 173 SCOTUS 1905-05-08 p. 697
Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission 226 U. S. 99 SCOTUS 1912-12-02 p. 697
Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works 237 U. S. 413 SCOTUS 1915-05-03 p. 697
Bruce v. Tobin 245 U. S. 18 SCOTUS 1917-10-22 p. 697