Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Magnum Import Co. v. de Spoturno Coty 262 U.S. 729

← Cases

Magnum Import Co. v. de Spoturno Coty

262 U.S. 729 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1923-04-17 Docket No. 978; No. 979; No. 980; No. 981; No. 982 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 729
No. 978.
No. 979.
No. 980.
No. 981.
No. 982.
Magnum Import Company, Inc. v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty; Max L. Cohn, trading as Maclen Import Company, v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty; Arthur Baum et al., trading as Beautex Company, v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty; Magnum Import Company, Inc. v. Houbigant, Inc.; and Ivory Novelties Trading Company, Inc. v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty.
Argued on return to rule to show cause April 16, 17, 1923.
Order entered April 17, 1923.
Mr. Charles H. Tuttle, with whom Mr. Isaac Reiss and Mr. William J. Hughes were on the briefs, for petitioners. Mr. Asher Blum, with whom Mr. Hugo Mock was on the briefs, for Coty. Mr. George S. Homblower, with whom Mr. Lindley M. Garrison and Mr. Raoul E. Desvernine were on the brief, for Houbigant, Inc.

Syllabus

[See ante, 159, post, 738.]

On consideration of the petitions for suspending orders herein, and of the argument of counsel thereupon had, it is now here ordered by this Court that the said petitions be, and the name are hereby, denied.