County of Tuolumne v. Railroad Commission of California

Majority

p. 584

No. 281.

County of Tuolumne et al. v. Railroad Commission of the State of California et al.

Syllabus

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.

Argued March 9,10,1925.

Decided March 16, 1925.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the

p. 585

act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat: 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1 , 5-6; (2) Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 150 U. S. 85 , 88; Erie R. R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148 , 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46 , 51.

Mr. William Grant, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. A. P. Cutten and Mr. Carl I. Wheat, with whom Mr. Hugh Gordon and Mr. Wm. B. Bosley were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Cases cited

Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton 252 U. S. 1 SCOTUS 1920-03-01 p. 585
Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong 150 U. S. 85 SCOTUS 1893-10-30 p. 585
Erie Railroad v. Purdy 185 U. S. 148 SCOTUS 1902-04-07 p. 585
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Woodford 234 U. S. 46 SCOTUS 1914-05-25 p. 585