Majority
p. 627No. 151. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, et al. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Argued January 19, 20, 1926. Decided January 25, 1926.
Syllabus
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas.[Mr. Vincent M. Miles, with whom Mr. Thomas B. Pryor was on the brief, for appellants. . Mr. E. W.
Affirmed with costs, upon the authority of Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 258 U. S. 165 , 175; Galveston Electric Co. v. City of Galveston, 258 U. S. 388 , 395; State of Missouri ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 262 U. S. 276 , 287; Georgia Ry. & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Georgia, 262 U. S. 625 , 631; Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 263 U. S. 679 , 690.
p. 628
Clausen, with whom Messrs. J. W. Jamison and C. M. Bracelen were on the brief, for appellee.
Cases cited
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. 258 U. S. 165 p. 627
- Galveston Electric Co. v. City of Galveston 258 U. S. 388 p. 627
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri 262 U. S. 276 p. 627
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission 262 U. S. 625 p. 627
- 263 U. S. 679 263 U. S. 679 p. 627