Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Piedmont 274 U.S. 723

← Cases

Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Piedmont

274 U.S. 723 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1927-05-16 Docket No. 313 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 723
No. 313.
Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Piedmont, Oliver Ellsworth, Mayor, G. N. Richardson, City Attorney, etc., et al.

Syllabus

Certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Argued April 29, 1927.
Decided May 16, 1927.
Mr. John G. Milburn, with whom Messrs, Ralph Bamberger, Henry B. Dinkelspeil, and Joseph W. Welsh were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Edwin C. Brandenburg, with whom Messrs. G. N. Richardson, C. A. Brandenburg, and Louis M. Denit were on the brief, for- appellees.

Question No. 1 is answered yes on the authority of Real Silk Hosiery v. City of Portland, 268 U. S. 335 . Mr. Justice Brandeis and Mr. Justice Sanford dissent. In view of the answer to the first question, the second question needs none.

Cases cited

  • 268 U. S. 335 268 U. S. 335 p. 723