Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Nones v. Holloway 274 U.S. 724

← Cases

Nones v. Holloway

274 U.S. 724 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1927-05-31 Docket No. 903; No. 904; No. 905; No. 906 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 724
No. 903. No. 904. No. 905. No. 906.
Anna E. Holloway Nones, Individually and as Executrix of Edward Lee Holloway, deceased, v. Grace Suzanne Holloway, Infant, and Marie Calou, Guardian of the person & estate of Grace Suzanne Holloway, Infant, et al.; Anna E Holloway Nones, Individually and as Executrix of Edward Lee Holloway, deceased, v. Grace Suzanne Holloway, Infant, and Marie Calou, Guardian of the person & estate of Grace Suzane Holloway, Infant, et al.; Clarence J. Holloway v. Grace Suzanne Holloway, Infant, and Marie Calou, Guardian of the person & estate of Grace Suzanne Holloway, Infant, et al.; and Clarence J. Holloway v. Grace Suzanne Holloway, Infant, and Marie Calou, Guardian of the person & estate of Grace Suzanne Holloway,
p. 725
Infant, et al.

Syllabus

Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted April 30, 1927.
Decided May 31, 1927.
Messrs. Isaac L. Straus, Joseph C. France, and Charles McH. Howard for defendants in error, in support of the motion.
Messrs. Edgar Allen Poe and E. Parkin Keech, Jr., for plaintiffs in error, in opposition thereto.

Dismissed for want of a federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561 , 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712 , 720; and Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144 , 147.

Cases cited