Majority
p. 695No. 339. Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford et al. Argued March 14, 1930. Decided March 17, 1930.
Mr. William H. Watkins, with whom Messrs. A. F. Gardner., Sr., H. T. Odom, P. H. Eager, Jr., A. F. Gardner, Jr., and
p. 696
J. N. Flowers were on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. John Ambrose Tyson, A. McC. Kimbrough, and O. L. Kimbrough on the brief for appellees.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29 ; Erie R. R. Co: v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427 ; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174 ; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182 ; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600 ; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605 ; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191 ; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180 ,183,184; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326 , 334.
Cases cited
- Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan 192 U. S. 29 p. 696
- Erie Railroad v. Solomon 237 U. S. 427 p. 696
- Zucht v. King 260 U. S. 174 p. 696
- Sugarman v. United States 249 U. S. 182 p. 696
- 276 U. S. 600 276 U. S. 600 p. 696
- 276 U. S. 605 276 U. S. 605 p. 696
- Roe v. Kansas ex rel. Smith 278 U. S. 191 p. 696
- Sayward v. Denny 158 U. S. 180 at 184 p. 696
- Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co. 228 U. S. 326 p. 696