Meyers v. Whittle — 283 U.S. 795

Majority

p. 795

No. 838.

Meyers v. Whittle, Sheriff.

Submitted April 13, 1931.

Decided April 20, 1931.

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Malloy v. South Carolina, 237 U. S. 180 , 183, 185; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29 ; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U.S. 427 ; Zucht v. King, 260

p. 796

U. S. 174 ; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182 ; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600 ; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605 ; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191 .

Mr. Benjamin E. Pierce for appellant.

Messrs. George M. Napier and T. R. Gress for appellee.

Cases cited

Malloy v. South Carolina 237 U. S. 180 SCOTUS 1915-04-05 at 185 p. 795
Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan 192 U. S. 29 SCOTUS 1904-01-04 p. 795
Erie Railroad v. Solomon 237 U.S. 427 SCOTUS 1915-05-10 p. 795
Sugarman v. United States 249 U. S. 182 SCOTUS 1919-03-03 p. 796
276 U. S. 600 276 U. S. 600 p. 796
276 U. S. 605 276 U. S. 605 p. 796
Roe v. Kansas ex rel. Smith 278 U. S. 191 SCOTUS 1929-01-02 p. 796