Majority
p. 561No. 34. Rhodes et al. v. Twing et al. Jurisdictional statement
p. 562submitted September 15, 1932. Decided October 10, 1932.
Mr. Oliver J. Todd for appellants. Mr. Jewell P. Lightfoot for appellees.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179 , 181; Jett Bros. Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1 , 6, 7; Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99 , 106; Hooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114 , 116, 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354 , 357.
Cases cited
- Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal 251 U. S. 179 p. 562
- Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton 252 U. S. 1 at 7 p. 562
- Citizens National Bank v. Durr 257 U. S. 99 p. 562
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. 261 U. S. 114 at 117 p. 562
- Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad Commission 269 U. S. 354 p. 562