Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners — 287 U.S. 563

Majority

p. 563

No. 45.

Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners of Colorado et al.

Jurisdictional statement submitted September 15, 1932.

Decided October 10, 1932.

Messrs. Emory L. O’Connell, Albert E. Sherlock, and Arthur X. Erickson for appellant. Messrs. Clarence L. Ireland and Charles H. Haines for appellees.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U. S. 86 , 108, 111; Fox v. Washington, 236 U. S. 273 , 277, 278; Miller v. Strahl, 239 U. S. 426 , 434; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343 , 348; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497 , 501, 502, 503; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374 , 393; Lavine v. California, 286 U. S. 528 . In so far as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek review of the ruling of the Supreme Court of Colorado upon the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution by the proceedings before the State Board in this cause, not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari (§ 237(c), Judicial Code as amended by the . Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936 , 938) and certiorari is denied.

Cases cited

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas 212 U. S. 86 SCOTUS 1909-01-18 at 111 p. 563
Fox v. Washington 236 U. S. 273 SCOTUS 1915-02-23 at 278 p. 563
Miller v. Strahl 239 U. S. 426 SCOTUS 1915-12-20 p. 563
Omaechevarria v. Idaho 246 U. S. 343 SCOTUS 1918-03-18 p. 563
Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman 266 U. S. 497 SCOTUS 1925-01-05 at 502 p. 563
Sproles v. Binford 286 U. S. 374 SCOTUS 1932-05-23 p. 563
286 U. S. 528 286 U. S. 528 p. 563