Morrison v. California — 288 U.S. 591

Majority

p. 591

No. 662.

Morrison et al. v. California.

Jurisdictional statement submitted February li, 1933.

Decided February 20, 1933.

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35 , 42, 43; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U. S. 178 , 183-185; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U. S. 502 . (2) Cockrill v. California, 268 U. S. 258 , 261, 262; Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U. S. 225 , 232, 233; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138 , 144. Mr. J. Marion Wright for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. Turnipseed 219 U. S. 35 SCOTUS 1910-12-19 at 43 p. 591
Hem v. United States 268 U. S. 178 SCOTUS 1925-04-27 p. 591
Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Ford 287 U. S. 502 SCOTUS 1933-01-09 p. 591
Cockrill v. California 268 U. S. 258 SCOTUS 1925-05-11 at 262 p. 591
Porterfield v. Webb 263 U. S. 225 SCOTUS 1923-11-12 at 233 p. 591
Patsone v. Pennsylvania 232 U. S. 138 SCOTUS 1914-01-19 p. 591