Majority
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a -substantial federal question. (1) Ex parte Poresky, ante, p. 30; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103 , 105; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308 , 311; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U.S. 20 , 24; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191 . (2) Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U.S. 138 , 144; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117 , 123; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374 , 396. (3) United States v. Grimaud, 220 U.S. 506 , 516, 518; United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1 , 11, 12; Hampton & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 394 , 406, 407.
Cases cited
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin 289 U.S. 103 p. 595
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown 187 U. S. 308 p. 595
- Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of Philadelphia 245 U.S. 20 p. 595
- Roe v. Kansas ex rel. Smith 278 U.S. 191 p. 595
- Patsone v. Pennsylvania 232 U.S. 138 p. 595
- Silver v. Silver 280 U.S. 117 p. 595
- Sproles v. Binford 286 U.S. 374 p. 595
- United States v. Grimaud 220 U.S. 506 at 518 p. 595
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. 272 U.S. 1 at 12 p. 595
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States 276 U.S. 394 at 407 p. 595