Archerd v. Oregon — 290 U.S. 604

Majority

p. 604

No. 602.

Archerd v. Oregon.

Jurisdictional statement submitted December 17, 1933.

Decided January 8, 1934.

Mr. Chester I. Long for appellant. Messrs. I. H. Van Winkle, Ralph E. Moody, and Willis S. Moore for appellee.

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U.S. 179 ; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 251 U.S. 114 , 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Comm’n, 269 U.S. 354 , 357, 358; (2) for the want of a reviewable judgment by the highest court of the State in which a decision could have been had. John v. Paullin, 231 U.S. 583 , 587; Newman v. Gates, 204 U.S. 89 , 95; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U.S. 101 ; Harrington v. Holler, 111 U.S. 796 ; and (3) for the want of a substantial federal question, Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 300 , 311; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U.S. 29 ; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191 . Mandate stayed and motion for -leave to file petition for rehearing granted January 22, 1934.

Cases cited

Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal 251 U.S. 179 SCOTUS 1919-12-22 p. 604
251 U.S. 114 251 U.S. 114 p. 604
Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad Commission 269 U.S. 354 SCOTUS 1926-01-04 at 358 p. 604
John v. Paullin 231 U.S. 583 SCOTUS 1913-12-22 p. 604
Newman v. Gates 204 U.S. 89 SCOTUS 1907-01-07 p. 604
214 U.S. 101 214 U.S. 101 p. 604
Harrington v. Holler 111 U.S. 796 SCOTUS 1884-05-05 p. 604
187 U.S. 300 187 U.S. 300 p. 604
Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan 192 U.S. 29 SCOTUS 1904-01-04 p. 604
Roe v. Kansas ex rel. Smith 278 U.S. 191 SCOTUS 1929-01-02 p. 604