Majority
p. 605No. 664. Schmeling v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Jurisdictional statement submitted December .30, 1933. Decided January 8, 1934.
Mr. Joseph H. Brady for appellant. ' Mr. Clay C. Rogers for appellee.
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U.S. 188 ; Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U.S. 219 ; Lower Vein Co. v. Industrial Board, 255 U.S. 144 ; Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. Industrial Commission, 262 U.S. 499 ; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674 ; 683; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U.S. 665 , 669, 670; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312 , 316, 317; Glenn v. Doyal, 285 U.S. 526 .
Cases cited
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. White 243 U.S. 188 p. 605
- Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington 243 U.S. 219 p. 605
- Lower Vein Coal Co. v. Industrial Board 255 U.S. 144 p. 605
- Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission 262 U.S. 499 p. 605
- Castillo v. McConnico 168 U.S. 674 p. 605
- McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. 233 U.S. 665 at 670 p. 605
- Hebert v. Louisiana 272 U.S. 312 at 317 p. 605
- 285 U.S. 526 285 U.S. 526 p. 605