Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart — 291 U.S. 643

Majority

p. 643

No. 740.

Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart et al.

Jurisdictional statement submitted February 3, 1934.

Decided February 12, 1934.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comm’rs, 146 U.S. 646 , 657; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268 ,

p. 644

271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U.S. 590 ; Howat v. Kansas, 258 U.S. 181 , 189, 190; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U.S. 302 , 303.

Messrs. Erwin R. Effler, Rufus H. Baker, and Harold W. Fraser for appellant. Messrs. Frazier Reams and J. S. Rhinefort for appellees.

Cases cited

Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Commissioners 146 U.S. 646 SCOTUS 1892-12-19 p. 643
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird 248 U.S. 268 SCOTUS 1919-01-07 p. 643
People ex rel. Doyle v. Atwell 261 U.S. 590 SCOTUS 1923-04-09 p. 644
Howat v. Kansas 258 U.S. 181 SCOTUS 1922-03-13 at 190 p. 644
McCoy v. Shaw 277 U.S. 302 SCOTUS 1928-05-21 p. 644