Lutz v. Houck

292 U.S. 603 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1934-04-30 Docket No. 919 English

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 603

No. 919.

Lutz v. Houck et al.

Motion submitted April 14, 1934.

Decided April 30, 1934.

Mr. George Clinton, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Henry Epstein for appellees.

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68 , 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517 , 548; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184 , 191, 192; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140 , 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292 , 296; Miller v. Wilson, 236 U.S. 373 , 384; Price v. Illinois, 238 U.S. 446 , 453; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117 , 123, 124; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374 , 396.

Cases cited

Hayes v. Missouri 120 U.S. 68 SCOTUS 1887-01-17 at 72 p. 603
Budd v. New York 143 U.S. 517 SCOTUS 1892-02-29 p. 603
Toyota v. Territory of Hawaii 226 U.S. 184 SCOTUS 1912-12-02 at 192 p. 603
Packard v. Banton 264 U.S. 140 SCOTUS 1924-02-18 at 144 p. 603
Radice v. People of New York 264 U.S. 292 SCOTUS 1924-03-10 p. 603
Miller v. Wilson 236 U.S. 373 SCOTUS 1915-02-23 p. 603
Price v. Illinois 238 U.S. 446 SCOTUS 1915-06-21 p. 603
Silver v. Silver 280 U.S. 117 SCOTUS 1929-11-25 at 124 p. 603
Sproles v. Binford 286 U.S. 374 SCOTUS 1932-05-23 p. 603