Majority
p. 610No. 1004. Ex parte Steckler et al. Jurisdictional statement submitted May 12, 1934. Decided May 21, 1934.
Mr. Thomas Gilmore for appellants.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Co., 125 U.S. 18 , 38, 39; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U.S. 632 , 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U.S. 272 , 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Upper Sandusky, 251 U.S. 173 , 178, 179; Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523 ; Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield, 287 U.S. 577 .
Cases cited
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co. 125 U.S. 18 at 39 p. 610
- Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana 224 U.S. 632 at 640 p. 610
- Long Sault Development Co. v. Call 242 U.S. 272 at 278 p. 610
- Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Village of Upper Sandusky 251 U.S. 173 at 179 p. 610
- Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co. 286 U.S. 523 p. 610
- 287 U.S. 577 287 U.S. 577 p. 610