← Cases

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo

292 U.S. 611 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1934-05-28 Docket No. 978; No. 979; No. 980; No. 981; No. 982 English

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 611
No. 978.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo et al.; Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Same; National Surety Co. v. Same; Guardian Casualty Co. v. Same; and Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, et al. v. Same.
No. 979.
No. 980.
No. 981.
No. 982.
Jurisdictional statement submitted May 5, 1934.
Decided May 28, 1934.

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438 , 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568 , 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157 , 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flannagan, 263 U.S. 444 , 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312 , 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Ken

p. 612
tucky, 273 U.S. 269 , 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, ante, p. 610. Mr. Ray Martin for appellants in Nos. 978, 979, and 980. Mr. Harold W. Fraser for appellant in No. 981.

Mr. U. G. Denman for appellants in No. 982. Messrs. Ralph W. Doty and Earl F. Boxell for appellees.

Cases cited