Secor v. Fulton — 293 U.S. 517

Majority

p. 517

No. 77.

Secor et al. v. Fulton, Superintendent of Banks.

Jurisdictional statement submitted September 10, 1934.

Decided October 8, 1934.

Mr. J. S. Rhinefort for appellants. Mr. John W. Bricker for appellee.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568 , 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157 , 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444 , 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312 , 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269 , 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610 ; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611 .

Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co. v. Washington ex rel. Linhoff 231 U. S. 568 SCOTUS 1913-12-22 p. 517
Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co. 243 U. S. 157 SCOTUS 1917-03-06 at 166 p. 517
Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan 263 U. S. 444 SCOTUS 1924-01-07 p. 517
Hebert v. Louisiana 272 U. S. 312 SCOTUS 1926-11-01 at 317 p. 517
American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky 273 U. S. 269 SCOTUS 1927-02-21 at 273 p. 517
292 U. S. 610 292 U. S. 610 p. 517
292 U. S. 611 292 U. S. 611 p. 517