Wade v. Jacksonville — 293 U.S. 518

Majority

p. 518

No. 163.

Wade et al. v. Jacksonville.

Motion submitted Sep

p. 519

tember 10, 1934.

Decided October 8, 1934.

Mr. Thomas B. Adams for appellants. Mr. Oscar O. McCollum for appellee.

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of properly presented federal questions (Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193 , 197-200; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357 , 360, 362, 363; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128 , 131-133; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604 ), and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question (Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674 , 681-684; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241 , 256, 257; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210 , 217; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312 , 316, 317).

Dewey v. Des Moines 173 U. S. 193 SCOTUS 1899-02-27 p. 519
Whitney v. California 274 U. S. 357 SCOTUS 1927-05-16 at 362 p. 519
Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. McGuire 196 U. S. 128 SCOTUS 1905-01-03 p. 519
290 U. S. 604 290 U. S. 604 p. 519
Castillo v. McConnico 168 U. S. 674 SCOTUS 1898-01-03 p. 519
Ballard v. Hunter 204 U. S. 241 SCOTUS 1907-01-14 at 257 p. 519
Witherspoon v. Duncan 4 Wall. 210 SCOTUS p. 519
Hebert v. Louisiana 272 U. S. 312 SCOTUS 1926-11-01 at 317 p. 519