Majority
p. 519No. 286. Kelliher et al. v. Investment & Securities Co. et al. Motion submitted September 10, 1934. Decided October 8, 1934.
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is
p. 520
dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question (Commercial Bank v. Buckingham’s Executors, 5 How. 317 , 342, 343; Boss v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150 , 161, 162; Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445 , 448, 449), and (2) for the want of a properly-presented federal question (Live Oak Water Users Assn, v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354 , 357, 358; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114 , 117; Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179 ; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604 ). The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied.
Mr. M. M. Kelliher, Amy Kelliher, and Tena Marsh, pro se. Mr. Channing Wake-field for appellees.
Cases cited
- President of the Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham's Executors 5 How. 317 at 343 p. 520
- Ross v. Oregon 227 U. S. 150 at 162 p. 520
- Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission 255 U. S. 445 at 449 p. 520
- Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad Commission 269 U. S. 354 at 358 p. 520
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. 261 U. S. 114 p. 520
- Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal 251 U. S. 179 p. 520
- 290 U. S. 604 290 U. S. 604 p. 520