Majority
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Pim v. St. Louis, 165 U. S. 673 ; Wall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 256 U. S. 125 ; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441 , 443. (2) Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157 , 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312 , 316; Ham, Commissioner, v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, ante, p. 505. In so far as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek a review of the rulings of the Supreme Court of Louisiana upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such
Mr. Alex W. Swords for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Cases cited
- 165 U. S. 673 165 U. S. 673 p. 511
- Wall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. 256 U. S. 125 p. 511
- Herndon v. Georgia 295 U. S. 441 p. 511
- Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co. 243 U. S. 157 p. 511
- Hebert v. Louisiana 272 U. S. 312 p. 511