Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen

Majority

p. 520

No. 603.

Southern Nebraska Power Co. et al. v. Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen, Attorney General.

p. 521

Jurisdictional statement distributed January 9, 1937.

Decided January 18, 1937.

Mr. B. F. Napheys, Jr., for appellants.

Mr. Edwin Vail for appellee.

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, Electric Co. v. Dow, 166 U. S. 489 , 492, 493; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641 , 648; Leonard v. Vicksburg Ry. Co., 198 U. S. 416 , 422, 423; Gause v. Detroit Trust Co., 297 U. S. 695 , (2) in so far as a federal question is sought to be presented, for the want of a substantial federal question, Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174 , 176; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182 , 184; Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Texas, 296 U. S. 552 .

Electric Co. v. Dow 166 U. S. 489 SCOTUS 1897-04-19 at 493 p. 521
Pierce v. Somerset Railway 171 U. S. 641 SCOTUS 1898-10-31 p. 521
Leonard v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad 198 U. S. 416 SCOTUS 1905-05-29 at 423 p. 521
297 U. S. 695 297 U. S. 695 p. 521
Zucht v. King 260 U. S. 174 SCOTUS 1922-11-13 p. 521
Sugarman v. United States 249 U. S. 182 SCOTUS 1919-03-03 p. 521
296 U. S. 552 296 U. S. 552 p. 521