Majority
p. 620No. 622. Cady et al., doing business as C. M. Cady & Sons v. Detroit et al. January 29, 1940.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365 ; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526 ; (2) Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U. S. 152 , 160-161; Standard Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U. S. 540 , 550; Warehouse Co. v. Tobacco Growers, 276
p. 621
U. S. 71 , 88; (3) Caperton v. Boywer, 14 Wall. 216 , 236-237; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441 , 442-443.
Mr. Edward N. Barnard for appellants.
Cases cited
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U. S. 365 p. 620
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago 242 U. S. 526 p. 620
- New York ex rel. Hatch v. Reardon 204 U. S. 152 p. 620
- Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright 225 U. S. 540 p. 620
- Caperton v. Bowyer 14 Wall. 216 p. 621
- Herndon v. Georgia 295 U. S. 441 p. 621