Hyperlawhypertext legal database Connor v. California 309 U.S. 631

← Cases

Connor v. California

309 U.S. 631 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1940-03-25 Docket No. 562 English

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 631
No. 562.
Connor v. California et al.
March 25, 1940.
Frank S. Connor, pro se and Mr. H. Thomas Austern for petitioner.
Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

The motion for a writ ,of certiorari to correct a diminution of the record is denied. The motion to' remand is granted, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration of the application for habeas corpus.'