Majority — Marshall C.J.
p. 774Ex Parte Martha Bradstreet, in the matter of Martha Bradstreet, Demandant v. Apollos Cooper et al. Tenants.[1]
Syllabus
MR JONES, of counsel for the demandant in the above named cases, moved the court for a rule to be granted, to be served on the district judge of the district court of the United Slates for the northern district of Now York, commanding him to be and. appear before this court, either in person or by an
p. 775
attorney of this court on the first day of the next January term of this court, to wit, on the second Monday of January, anno domini 1833, to show cause, if any behave, why a mandamus should not be awarded to the said district judge of the northern district of New York, commanding him,
1. To reinstate, and proceed to try and adjudge, according to the law and right of the case, the several writs of right ■and the mises thereon joined, lately pending in said court, and said to have been dismissed by order of said court, between Martha Bradstreet, demandant, and Apollos Cooper et al. tenants.
2. Requiring said court to admit such amendments in the form of pleading, or such evidence as may be necessary to aver or to ascertain the jurisdiction of said court in the several suits aforesaid.
3. Or if sufficient cause should be shown by the said judge on the return of this rule, or should otherwise áppear to this court, against a writ of mandamus requiring the matters and things aforesaid to be done by the said, judge, then to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue from this court, requiring the said judge to direct and cause full records of the judgments or orders of dismission in the several suits aforesaid, and of the processes of the same, to be duly made up and filed, so as to enable this court to re-exámine and decide the ground's and merits' of such judgments or orders upon writs of error, such records showing upon the face of each what judgments or final orders, dismissing, or otherwise definitively disposing of said suits, were rendered by-the said district court, at whose instance, upon what grounds, and what exceptions or objections were reserved or taken by said demandant, or on her behalf, to the judgments or decisions of the said district court in the premises, or to the motions whereon such judgments or decisions were found; and what motion or motions, application or applications, were made to said court by the demandant, or on her behalf; and either granted or overruled by said district court, both before and after said judgments, or decisions dismissing or otherwise finally disposing of said suits; especially what motions or applications were made - by said demandant or on her behalf to said district court, to be admitted to amend her counts in the said suits, or to produce evidence
p. 776
to establish the value of the lands, &c. demanded in such counts, together with all the papers filed, and proceedings had in said suits respectively.
On consideration whereof, it is now here considered and ordered by this court, that the rule prayed for be, and the same is hereby granted, returnable to the first day of the next January term of this court, to wit, on the second Monday of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and thirty-three.