Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Zap v. United States 326 U.S. 777

← Cases

Zap v. United States

326 U.S. 777 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1945-12-10 Docket No. 489 English

Judges Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the length of the brief does not justify the action taken by the Court.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 777
No. 489.
Zap v. United States.
December 10, 1945.
Mr. Morris Lavine for petitioner.
Solicitor General McGrath, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl, Walter J. Cummings, Jr. and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is denied for failure to comply with par. 2 of Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court. The brief filed in support of the petition is not “direct and concise” as required by that rule.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the length of the brief does not justify the action taken by the Court.