Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Brandt v. United States 333 U.S. 836

← Cases

Brandt v. United States

333 U.S. 836 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1948-02-16 Docket No. 286; No. 287; No. 288; No. 289; No. 290; No. 291; No. 292; No. 293; No. 294; No. 295; No. 296; No. 297; No. 298; No. 299 English

Judges Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that the petitions should be set for hearing on the question of the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 836
No. 286,
No. 287,
No. 288,
No. 289,
No. 290,
No. 291,
No. 292,
No. 293,
No. 294,
No. 295,
No. 296,
No. 297,
No. 298,
No. 299,
Misc.
Misc,
Brandt v. United States; Brack v. United States; Brandt v. United States; Gebhardt v. United States; Hoven v. United States; Mrugowsky v. United States; Sievers v. United States; Fischer v. United States; Genzken v. United States; Handloser v. United States; Rose v. United States; Schroeder v. United States; Becker-Freyseng v. United States; and Beigelboeck v. United States.

Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus and prohibition denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that the petitions should be set for hearing on the question of the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.