Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta National Maritime Union v. Herzog 334 U.S. 854

← Cases

National Maritime Union v. Herzog

334 U.S. 854 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1948-06-21 Docket No. 808 English

Judges Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 854
No. 808.
National Maritime Union of America et al. v. Herzog et al.

The decision of the statutory three-judge court is affirmed to the extent that it passes upon the validity of § 9 (f) and § 9 (g) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 ( 61 Stat. 136 , 143; 29 U. S. C. §§ 141 , 159 (f) 159 (g), Supp. 1947). We do not find it necessary to

p. 855
reach or consider the validity of § 9 (h).

William L. Standard and David Rein for appellants. Solicitor General Perlman for ap-pellees.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Statutes and regulations cited