Hyperlawhypertext legal database Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States 337 U.S. 952

← Cases

Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States

337 U.S. 952 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1949-06-27 Docket No. 749 English

Judges Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton dissent for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 337 U. S. 426, 444.

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 952
No. 749.
Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Sherwin A. Hill, Edward T. Goodrich, James McEvoy, Jr. and Harry D. Fenske for appellant.
Solicitor General Perlman for the United States; Daniel W. Knowlton, Edward M. Reidy and Daniel H. Kunkel for the Interstate Commerce Commission; and W. T. Pierson -and Frank H. Cole, Jr. for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

Judgment reversed. United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 337 U. S. 426 .

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton dissent for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 337 U. S. 426 , 444.

Cases cited