Hyperlawhypertext legal database Manning v. Ragen 338 U.S. 852

← Cases

Manning v. Ragen

338 U.S. 852 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1949-10-17 Docket No. 123, Misc.; No. 127, Misc.; No. 132, Misc.; No. 136, Misc.; No. 142, Misc.; No. 144, Misc.; No. 145, Misc. English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 852
No. 123, Misc.
No. 127, Misc.
No. 132, Misc.
No. 136, Misc.
No. 142, Misc.
No. 144, Misc.
No. 145, Misc.
Manning v. Ragen, Warden. Poppe v. Ragen, Warden. Rollo et al. v. Frisbie, Warden. Watkins v. California. Williams v. New York. Anderson v. Missouri. Reeder v. Ragen, Warden.

Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;

Supreme Court of Michigan ;

District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California;

Supreme Court of New York;

Supreme Court of Missouri;

p. 853
Bautz v. Ragen, Warden. Wells v. Ragen, Warden. Kellogg v. Miller, Warden. Banks v. Ragen, Warden. Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden.

No. 147, Misc.

No. 148, Misc.

No. 149, Misc.

No. 154, Misc.

No. 158, Misc.

Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;

Circuit Court of Madison County, Illinois;

Supreme Court of Wyoming;

Supreme Court of Illinois; and

Supreme Court of Illinois. The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are severally denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.