Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hoskins v. Moore 340 U.S. 804

← Cases

Hoskins v. Moore

340 U.S. 804 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1950-10-09 Docket No. 2; No. 4; No. 10; No. 21; No. 28; No. 33; No. 43; No. 80; No. 82; No. 84; No. 91; No. 92; No. 102; No. 112; No. 129; No. 149 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 804
No. 2,
No. 4,
No. 10,
No. 21,
No. 28,
No. 33,
No. 43,
No. 80,
No. 82,
No. 84,
No. 91,
No. 92,
No. 102,
No. 112,
No. 129,
No. 149,
Misc.
Hoskins v. Moore, Warden; Sterba v. Illinois; Hudson v. Overholser; Burkholder v. United States; Taylor v. Squier, Warden; Middleton v. Michigan; Stephenson v. Page, Warden; Gibbs v. Bushong, Superintendent; Fleet v. Swenson, Warden; Van Beek v. Michigan; Stewart v. Steele, Warden; Lang v. Mayo, Custodian; Grier v. Warden, State Prison; Carroll v. Swenson, Warden; Horn v. Frisbie, Warden; and Hull v. Frisbie, Warden.
Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Perlman for respondent in No. 28, Mise. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, Charles D.

The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus in these cases are severally denied.

p. 805
Mathews, First Assistant Attorney General, E. Jacobson and Calvin B. Garwood, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent in No. 2, Mise.