Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n 340 U.S. 924

← Cases

Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n

340 U.S. 924 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1951-02-26 Docket No. 504 English

Judges Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Delivered by *924 Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 924
No. 504.
Rosecrans et al. v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Association et al.
John H. Cantrell
p. 925
and B. H. Carey for appellants. David A. Richardson, T. Murray Robinson, Walace Hawkins, Robert W. Richards, Russell G. Lowe, Ralph W. Garrett, Don Emery, Rayburn L. Foster, R. M. Williams, Harry D. Turner and W. H. Brown for appellees.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the

want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.