Hyperlawhypertext legal database Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States 342 U.S. 845

← Cases

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States

342 U.S. 845 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1951-10-15 Docket No. 289 English

Judges Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of. this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 845
No. 289.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Harry E. Boe, Frank W. Sullivan, Warren H. ■ Wagner and Eldon Martin for appellants..
Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402 ; United States v. United States Smelting Co., 339 U. S. 186 .

Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of. this case.

Cases cited