Hyperlawhypertext legal database American Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board 344 U.S. 812

← Cases

American Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

344 U.S. 812 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1952-10-13 Docket No. 53 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 812
No. 53.
American Newspaper Publishers Association v. National Labor Relations Board.
Elisha Hanson, William K. Van Allen and Arthur B. Hanson for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Mozart G. Ratner and Bernard Dunau filed a memorandum for respondent, stating that counsel do not oppose the grant of the petition limited to the question of the interpretation of § 8 (b) (6) of the National Labor Relations Act.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to question No. 2 presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.:

“Whether the demand and insistence of the International Typographical Union that publishers pay employees in their composing rooms for setting ‘bogus’ violated Section 8 (b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act in view of the fact that composing room employees perform no service incident or essential to the production of a newspaper in their handling of such ‘bogused’ material.”